Second Polygraph examiners Report

Here is the second polygraph examiner's report which Whitehouse.com refused to post. It was posted on Larry Sinclair's site and can be downloaded in full by clicking here

Essentially the report supports Dr. Gelb's original conclusions but with one striking and very important difference. It can be found in this paragraph here

The important line is here... "I also evaluated the second series using the computer algorithum PolyScore (v. 6.0). It evaluated the chart as No Deception Indicated, and calculated the probability of deception as being less that .01 on a scale of .00 to 1.00.This was inconsistent with my numerical analysis."

The examiner then goes on to say that if there is a conflict between the examiner's score and PolyScore, then the human score takes precedence.

But, the important thing to note here is that 2 different results were obtained from the same test. One said No Deception Indicated and the other saying there was deception.

This is a MAJOR incongruity and casts doubt on the whole testing process. Reversespeech.com wonders if this is the real reason why Whitehouse.com did not publish this report as they promised they would.

Click here to go to original Sinclair reversal report